Model Post-Merger Benefit Integration—Quantify Cost of Leveling Up vs. Grandfathering vs. Tiered Harmonization
python# Benefit Harmonization Modeling def model_harmonization_scenarios(legacy_plan_a, legacy_plan_b, combined_population): scenarios = {} # Scenario 1: Status Quo (Grandfather both plans) scenarios['status_quo'] = { 'plan_a_cost': legacy_plan_a.annual_pmpy * legacy_plan_a.member_count, 'plan_b_cost': legacy_plan_b.annual_pmpy * legacy_plan_b.member_count, 'total_cost': (legacy_plan_a.annual_pmpy * legacy_plan_a.member_count) + (legacy_plan_b.annual_pmpy * legacy_plan_b.member_count), 'admin_complexity': 'HIGH', # Dual plan administration 'employee_perception': 'NEGATIVE' # Inequity concerns } # Scenario 2: Level Up (Everyone to richer plan) richer_plan = legacy_plan_a if legacy_plan_a.annual_pmpy > legacy_plan_b.annual_pmpy else legacy_plan_b # Induced demand: richer benefits increase utilization induced_demand_factor = calculate_utilization_elasticity( old_plan=legacy_plan_b if richer_plan == legacy_plan_a else legacy_plan_a, new_plan=richer_plan ) # Returns 1.08-1.15 (8-15% utilization increase) scenarios['level_up'] = { 'total_cost': (richer_plan.annual_pmpy * combined_population.total_members * induced_demand_factor), 'cost_increase': scenarios['status_quo']['total_cost'] * (induced_demand_factor - 1), 'admin_complexity': 'LOW', # Single plan 'employee_perception': 'POSITIVE' # Everyone wins } # Scenario 3: Level Down (Everyone to leaner plan) leaner_plan = legacy_plan_a if legacy_plan_a.annual_pmpy < legacy_plan_b.annual_pmpy else legacy_plan_b # Reverse elasticity: worse benefits suppress utilization (but not 1:1) suppression_factor = 0.95 # Conservative 5% utilization reduction scenarios['level_down'] = { 'total_cost': (leaner_plan.annual_pmpy * combined_population.total_members * suppression_factor), 'cost_savings': scenarios['status_quo']['total_cost'] - (leaner_plan.annual_pmpy * combined_population.total_members * suppression_factor), 'admin_complexity': 'LOW', 'employee_perception': 'VERY_NEGATIVE', # Half the workforce gets worse benefits 'retention_risk': 'HIGH' } # Scenario 4: Tiered Harmonization (Job grade tiers) executive_tier = design_plan(deductible=500, oop_max=3000, copay_specialist=30) manager_tier = design_plan(deductible=1500, oop_max=5000, copay_specialist=50) employee_tier = design_plan(deductible=2500, oop_max=7000, copay_specialist=75) scenarios['tiered'] = { 'total_cost': ( (executive_tier.pmpy * combined_population.executives) + (manager_tier.pmpy * combined_population.managers) + (employee_tier.pmpy * combined_population.employees) ), 'admin_complexity': 'MEDIUM', 'employee_perception': 'MIXED' # Transparency around tiers required } # Scenario 5: Cost-Neutral Hybrid (Find the middle) target_cost = scenarios['status_quo']['total_cost'] hybrid_plan = optimize_plan_design( target_pmpy=target_cost / combined_population.total_members, constraints={ 'min_deductible': min(legacy_plan_a.deductible, legacy_plan_b.deductible), 'max_deductible': max(legacy_plan_a.deductible, legacy_plan_b.deductible), 'preserve_rx_coverage': True } ) scenarios['cost_neutral_hybrid'] = { 'total_cost': target_cost, 'plan_design': hybrid_plan, 'admin_complexity': 'LOW', 'employee_perception': 'NEUTRAL', # Nobody gets everything, nobody loses everything 'recommended': True } return scenarios # Example Output: # Company A (2,400 employees, $9,200 PMPY, $500 deductible) # Company B (1,600 employees, $11,800 PMPY, $1,500 deductible) # # Status Quo: $41.0M total # Level Up: $51.2M (+$10.2M, 25% increase due to induced demand) # Level Down: $36.8M (-$4.2M savings, HIGH retention risk) # Tiered: $43.5M (+$2.5M, MEDIUM complexity) # Cost-Neutral Hybrid: $41.0M (balanced design: $1,000 deductible) # # Recommendation: Cost-Neutral Hybrid
Don't let HR pressure force you into upward harmonization. Model 5 scenarios. Quantify induced demand. Find the cost-neutral middle. Turn benefit integration into a strategic advantage.
Model Harmonization Scenarios→